Painters Painting UFOs

To show you how we can be brain washed so easily, let me tell you about a 
picture that I have looked at most of my life but never thought anything 
about what is in the picture. 

I see the Pope with flying objects above the crowed. Is this picture 
supposed to show that Jesus and heaven is in another dimension or are they 
supposed to be returning in ships?

http://www.dudeman.net/siriusly/ufo/art.html

Reports of unidentified flying objects appear in our most ancient historical 
records

ITALY'S Old Masters were recording flying saucers and UFOs in their 
paintings as far back as the 15th century, according to a scientist in Rome. 
Roberto Volterri argues that artists dating back to 1406 included evidence 
of "strange objects in the sky" for later generations to see. 

 Rense.com
________________________________


UFOs In 15th Century Paintings
By Richard Owen
The Australian
12-4-2

(Note - For a grand tour of UFOs in old paintings, etc see the UFOs In Art 
History
on the left side of rense.com under Features. -ed)

Italy's Old Masters were recording flying saucers and UFOs in their 
paintings as far back as the 15th century, according to a scientist in Rome.

Roberto Volterri argues that artists dating back to 1406 included evidence 
of "strange objects in the sky" for later generations to see. He says that 
far from being the product of the paranoid Cold War years, UFOs were 
documented but overlooked because they were often extraneous to the subject 
of the painting and could only be explained as "testimonials of something 
seen or heard about".

Volterri, 56, an archaeologist by training, specialises in the measurement 
and analysis of metallic objects. He said he had spent his working life in a 
thoroughly down-to-earth environment of cold and rational calculation and 
sophisticated and precise instruments, but he was convinced science did not 
have all the answers.

"I have been fascinated by the inexplicable since I was a boy," he said. 
"Scientists tend to dismiss what cannot be rationally explained as belonging 
to the realm of fantasy. But it is the job of science to examine what seems 
mysterious, not to dismiss it out of hand."

He has published a book, As the Ancient Chronicles Relate, in which he 
claims to show that past generations have also wondered whether there is 
life beyond that on earth.

Perhaps the most striking example is The Madonna and St John, attributed to 
Fra Filippo Lippi (1406-1469) and kept at the Palazzo Vecchio in Florence. 
In it a man and a dog are clearly gazing up at a UFO-type object behind the 
Virgin Mary's shoulder. No less baffling is a painting by Masolino da 
Panicale (1383-1447), The Miracle of the Snow, painted in 1429 and kept at 
the Capodimonte Museum in Naples. "The painting shows a real event in Rome 
in the second half of the fourth century AD," Volterri said. "But what are 
these strange, dark, elongated clouds in the shape of UFOs?"

Volterri said he had compared these with photographs taken in 1955 in Namur, 
Belgium, which purport to show cigar-shaped UFOs. By contrast, Glorification 
of the Eucharist, by Bonaventura Salimbeni (1567-1613), in the church of San 
Lorenzo in San Pietro, at Montalcino near Siena, shows "what looks very like 
a satellite such as the Russian Sputnik".

Volterri said that in La Tebaide, by Paolo Uccello (1397-1475), objects in 
the sky were identical to photographs taken of supposed UFOs in the US in 
the 1950s and 6Os.

But Martin Kemp, professor of the History of Art at Oxford University, said 
the "Renaissance UFOs" had a perfectly rational explanation.

"Many artists used their imaginations to represent celestial or sacred 
powers," he said. "The objects in Masolino da Panicale's painting were not 
UFOs at all but merely clouds schematised to fit in with his perspective."

The Times
The Australian
© 2002 News Limited

http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,5611607%255E13762,00.html

Betty Hill was right!

(CNN Report) -- In the midst of chaos here on Earth, scientists are finding hope for life on other planets.


Scientists announced Thursday, April 18, 2013, the discovery of three planets that are some of the best candidates so far for habitable worlds outside our own solar system -- and they're very far away.

NASA's Kepler satellite, which is keeping an eye on more than 150,000 stars in hopes of identifying Earth-like planets, found the trio.

Two of the planets -- Kepler-62e and Kepler-62f -- are described in a study released Thursday, April 18, 2013, in the journal Science. They are part of a five-planet system in which the candidates for life are the farthest from the host star.

The host star -- the equivalent of Earth's sun -- takes the name Kepler-62, where the individual planets are designated by letters thereafter.

A third planet that's potentially habitable, but not included in the Science study, is called Kepler-69c. A study about it and its system is published in The Astrophysical Journal.

These are the smallest planets ever found in the "habitable zone," the area near a star in which a planet can theoretically hold liquid water. Kepler-69c seems less clearly in the habitable zone than the other two planets, but scientists haven't ruled it out.

When Betty and Barney Hill was captured and examined by aliens in the 1960s, Betty memorized a star map on the wall of her examining room. At that time no one knew that planets outside our solar system existed. Some of the stars on the map was not known to Earth Astronamers until the 1970s and 1980s. Now we are starting to find out that planets are all over the Milky Way Galaxy. Recently, we found out Earth like planet are numerous thoughout this galaxy.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/18/earth-like-planets-alien-kepler-water_n_3111448.html

See what the Huffington Post has to say about the new planets.

Here is the report by MSNBC on this subject.

NASA: Twin planets, perfectly habitable, just discovered by world scientists:
(http://news.msn.com/science-technology/nasa-twin-planets-perfectly-habitable-just-discovered#tscptme)'

Stan Friedman the famous UFOLOGIST will give a lecture at the convention, "Man's Place in the Universe."

Nuclear War in the Distant Past

In the summer of 1945 the United States Army Air Force dropped two Atomic Bombs on two Japanese Cities. It was the first and only time that a city was destroyed by an atomic explosion. In my opinion, don't believe that non-sense. It has happened before, thousands of years ago in Rajasthan, India.

This is the ruins of Harappa.

The story begins when a layer of radioactive ash was found in Rajasthan, India. It covered a three-square mile area, ten miles west of Jodhpur. The research occurred after a very high rate of birth defects and cancer was discovered in the area.

The levels of radiation registered so high on investigators’ gauges that the Indian government cordoned off the region. Scientists then apparently unearthed an ancient city where they found evidence of an atomic blast dating back thousands of years: from 8,000 to 12,000 years.

The blast was said to have destroyed most of the buildings and probably a half-million people.

Archeologist Francis Taylor stated that etchings in some nearby temples he translated suggested that they prayed to be spared from the great light that was coming to lay ruin to the city.

“It’s so mind-boggling to imagine that some civilization had nuclear technology before we did. The radioactive ash adds credibility to the ancient Indian records that describe atomic warfare.”

When excavations of Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro reached the street level, they discovered skeletons scattered about the cities, many holding hands and sprawling in the streets as if some instant, horrible doom had taken place.

People were just lying, unburied, in the streets of the city. And these skeletons are thousands of years old, even by traditional archaeological standards.

What could cause such a thing? Why did the bodies not decay or get eaten by wild animals?

Furthermore, there is no apparent cause of a physically violent death.

A. Gorbovsky, in Riddles of Ancient History, reported the discovery of at least one human skeleton in this area with a level of radioactivity approximately 50 times greater than it should have been due to natural radiation.

Furthermore, thousands of fused lumps, christened “black stones”, have been found at Mohenjo-Daro. These appear to be fragments of clay vessels that melted together in extreme heat.

Another curious sign of an ancient nuclear war in India is a giant crater near Bombay. The nearly circular 2,154-metre-diameter Lonar crater (left image), located 400 kilometers northeast of Bombay and aged at less than 50,000 years old, could be related to nuclear warfare of antiquity.

No trace of any meteoric material, etc., has been found at the site or in the vicinity, and this is the world’s only known “impact” crater in basalt. Indications of great shock (from a pressure exceeding 600,000 atmospheres) and intense, abrupt heat (indicated by basalt glass spherules) can be ascertained from the site.

With the apparent discovery of this radiated area, parallels were quick drawn to the Mahabharata, the Indian epic.

Do you want to know more about this? Read the links below:

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ancientatomicwar/esp_ancient_atomic_07.htm

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_ancient_atomic.htm#menu
An ancient, heavily populated city in Pakistan was instantly destroyed 2,000 years before Christ by an incredible explosion that could only been caused by an atomic bomb.

Could this be why we have ancient nuclear waste dumps all over the world? Is this why when we started using nuclear material, aliens started showing up in greater numbers all over the Earth? Is the affects of the first nuclear age the reason why someone ordered the worldwide energy grid dismantled and all flying machines destroyed? 

Ancient nuclear waste dumps does not fit into American history or western traditions. This proves that the United States was not the first to explode an atomic bomb. Therefore, this information is ignored by the west.

Man and Woman Landed on the Moon in 2309 B.C.

Did humans land here in 1969 A.D. or 2309 B. C.?



RIPLEY’s BELIEVE IT OR NOT!

TAKE A LOOK AT THE WORLD’s WEIRDEST FACTS

Ripley Publishing, October 2004, ISBN# 1893951731
National release date: Wednesday, October 6, 2004

"WERE WE ALREADY ON THE MOON IN 2309 B.C.? DID AN EXTRATERRESTIAL CIVILIZATION IN EONS PAST -- THE ’ALIEN RAJ’ -- TAKE EARTH HUMANS ON FREQUENT VISITS TO OTHER PARTS OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM AND THE GALAXY AND THEN RETURN THEM TO SOL III WHERE THEIR WRITTEN EXPERIENCES BECAME ’LEGENDS,’ ’MYTHS,’ AND ’FOLKLORE?!’- "

By Jonathan Gray

FLASH: First Moon Landing? According to Chinese historical tradition, a man and a woman landed on the Moon over 4,000 years ago. The engineer Hou-Yih and his wife, Chang Ngo, flew to the Moon on a "celestial bird."

Their descriptions of the conditions on the Moon were incredibly ACCURATE. Was their journey the result of an overactive imagination or did they really go there using technology that was later lost to mankind? [ p. 11 ]

If you want to know more about the first recorded moon landing, look at the link below;
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/esp_luna_10.htm

People had flying machines and flew all over the world.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_hitech01.htm#airplanes
There is no shortage of descriptions of flying machines in ancient sources. If we try to extract the core of myths of different provenience and remove the embellishments, we discover to our surprise that flying in ancient times seems to be the rule, not the exception.

The history books are written with a persons and nations bias in mind. For example, western people follow history from a western point of view. Western history is design to tell the people that western traditions are superior to any other traditions.

Many things that we do today have been done in the past. Our ancestors did not write history down in detail as we do today.



Soon They Can't Deny It!

This is the habitable zone for life to take place on planet orbiting stars.

As our space probes find more and more out about the Universe, the majority of scientist seem to be more and more surprised. They still don't want to believe that people are out in space. The majority of the American people believe that people live on other planets. People don't have to believe. All they have to do is look at the evidence on Earth. Below is an article from CNN on what the scientist have found.

January 8th, 2013


01:00 PM ET

Planets, planets, planets!

By Elizabeth Landau, CNN

We still don't know if Earth, as a planet that currently harbors life, is alone in the universe. But scientists are actively searching for clues about other potential habitable worlds outside our solar system.

Astronomers are presenting their latest findings at the American Astronomical Society annual conference in Long Beach, California, this week. The word on the cosmic street is that Earth-sized planets are relatively common and that hundreds of new planet candidates have been identified.

"We have begun to truly map the planets in our galaxy akin to the way that early explorers mapped the Earth," said Sara Seager, professor of planetary science and physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, who works with data from the NASA Kepler mission, which aims to identify planets outside of Earth's solar system.

Scientists from the University of California, Berkeley and the University of Hawaii at Manoa have estimated that 17% of stars that are like our sun host planets with a diameter of one to two times that of Earth, which orbit close to these stars.

This is based on data from NASA's Kepler mission, which can only detect planets that have a much smaller orbital radius (about 25%) than Earth's. That means that 17% of sun-like stars in the galaxy would have a planet about the size of Earth, or slightly bigger, within the orbit of Mercury.

If we're talking about planets about the size of Earth or a little bigger - that are within Earth-like orbits - that could apply to as many as 50% of all stars in the galaxy, but that doesn't mean these planets could host life.

A planet with a diameter of two to three times that of Earth would generally resemble Uranus and Neptune, according to the scientists. These planets would have a rocky core, hydrogen and helium gases and maybe even water. Near to a star, a rocky planet could have oceans with depths of hundreds of miles.

The Kepler telescope takes repeated images of the constellation Cygnus - specifically, of 150,000 stars. Computer software analyzes those images by looking for dimming of the stars, which might indicate that a planet is passing in front of it during orbit. At least three transits must be observed to be considered the signal of a planet candidate.

"Based on the new Kepler results, it's just breathtaking to realize that some of our very nearest neighboring stars must have Earth-size planets," Seager said.

It is easier for Kepler to detect big planets because these planets make the star dim more than small planets during transit. For example, a Jupiter-sized planet makes a star dim by one part in 100, while a planet the size of Earth would only dim a star by one part in 10,000. Given these limitations, researchers estimate that Kepler misses about one in four Earth-sized planets.

And there's more news from Kepler this week: The mission has discovered 461 candidate planets. That means that they still need to be confirmed as planets, but there's a whole lot of them. In terms of potential targets for extraterrestrial life, four of these are less than twice the size of Earth and have orbits in the "habitable zone."

That's the term astronomers use to talk about the range of distance from a star in which liquid water could exist on a planet's surface.

The 461 planets come from observations that took place from May 2009 to March 2011. Researchers found an uptick in the number of smaller planet candidates and the stars that have more than one potential planet orbiting them.

Kepler's database of potential planets has increased 20% since February 2012, with a total of 2,740 planet candidates orbiting 2,036 stars.

Scientists must perform additional analyses to confirm that a planet exists. So far, from the Kepler data, there have been 105 planets confirmed.

It appears 43% of the potential planets identified by Kepler have neighbor planets, meaning many of them exist in multi-planet solar systems.

Follow @CNNLightYears on Twitter

Keep in mind, I told you about this map that Betty Hill remembered seeing in the space ship that abducted her and her husband in the 1960s. At that time, scientist said that other planets outside our solar system did not exist. Now we find out that other planets around other stars do exist. Betty's map above looks like a map of trade routes to me.

I wonder when the governments of the world especially the United States will get around to telling us about other people on other worlds? The Russians and some former Canadian government officials have done so already. The Vatican is now saying after years of excommunicating people that it is OK to believe in UFOs and aliens. So the day is coming and it is coming fast!